I think that Iran should be allowed to pursue nuclear technology and nuclear weapons, because like the Iranian youth said in Jared Cohen's book, so many other countries have nuclear capabilities and nuclear weapons; the U.S. is one of them. That being said, who are we to deny another country that right? Granted that the U.S. is part of the UN Security Council it is partly our duty; however, that duty is to ensure safety. Yes, Iran has terrorist groups, but so do many other countries, yet Iran is one of only a few countries who has attacked us at home. I think that this is what's causing such a large problem. Had the events of 9/11 never occurred, I feel like this would be a non-issue.
When it comes to how nuclear capabilities and weapons will affect the country and the Iranian government, I think that, although it's not ideal because it would strengthen the regime, it's up to the people. I do understand that it is very hard for the people to be involved in government outside of the voting process, which is questionable in itself, but that doesn't mean there isn't anything they could do. We already see the way that technology is allowing the youth to rebel against the government, and once the youth are the ones in power, which will happen, things are going to start changing quite drastically. So, in this way, the people will have their say and the decision, I believe, should ultimately be theirs.
As for what I would consider my red line, it's hard to say. I don't know if I would consider nuclear weapons or capabilities a red line or if I would consider the closing of the Strait of Hormuz a red line. I don't think there's cause to take action against Iran just because they acquire nuclear capabilities or weapons. I also don't think closing the Strait of Hormuz is reason to take action. I do understand that the Strait of Hormuz provides 1/4 of the world's oil, but the closing of the Strait of Hormuz would be to upset the world. If we show how angry and desperate we are over this issue, Iran will gain the upper hand; they will be the puppeteer, we the puppets. Because of this, I'm not sure what issue I would exactly consider to be the red line and I'm not sure what a good enough reason is to take actions against Iran.
Do you think any country should be allowed to have nuclear weapons? If not then where do we say no? I think if every country has weapons, it makes nuclear warfare inevitable and is going to lead to much destruction. I think further production of nuclear weapons in any country should be stopped because they are just too powerful. At what point do you think Iran should be stopped? I think a country with that much animosity and clear hatred toward America and Israel should not be allowed to produce such powerful and destructive weapons.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the comment above! When given nuclear weapons to clearly hate filled governments is it really fine? When countries would not think twice about blowing up Israel or the USA should they really have nuclear weapons? Granted we should not tell people no when we have them however when nuclear war is a possibility it shows not all countries should get nuclear weapons. Some governments will not hold back and they will just do things for themselves which is scary and why not all countries including Iran should get nuclear weapons. It is just too big of a risk
ReplyDeleteI understand your point, but do you not think that Israel would be just as willing to blow up Iran? Israel and Iran have an ongoing war, and with Israel possessing nuclear weapons, I believe it's more dangerous for Iran to not have them. Especially with what's going on in the Middle East, Israel is getting fed up with Iran's shenanigans. Shouldn't the government of Iran be able to say they can thoroughly protect their people. With the knowledge of Iran having a nuclear bomb, Israel will be much more hesitant to act.
ReplyDeleteI also believe that a lot of governments do things for themselves. The USA is a perfect example. Our government doesn't just make deals based solely on the people's interest; a lot of the decisions made take into consideration what the government will get in return.